Why Socialists And Despots Can Not. by Dean Gotcher

Why Socialists And Despots Can Not ...
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

... allow the preaching, teaching, and discussing of the Word of God (to be accepted as is, by faith) in the public arena (or in the private)—which would result in the socialist or despot 1) accepting the fact or truth that they are wrong and, having a guilty conscience (what the father's/Father's authority engenders in the individual for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating), repenting, or 2) "the people," having repented for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, removing him from office—which, in the socialist's or despot's mind, is solely for the purpose of him "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, with "the peoples" affirmation. The preaching, teaching, and discussing of the Word of God (to be accepted as is, by faith) in the public arena engenders a guilty conscience in the listener, i.e., in the individual, "the people," and the leader for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, pressuring them (bringing them under conviction) to admit that they are wrong and repent to the Father for their sins, i.e., for their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating. Therefore, if the socialist or despot is to rule over "the people" he must first remove (negate) anyone who gets in the way of his "lusts," i.e., his "self interests," i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating—including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous. To do so the individual and "the people," i.e., "the group" must, along with the leader, i.e., the facilitator of 'change' reject the preaching, teaching, and discussing of the Word of God (to be accepted as is, by faith) in the public arena, i.e., in the classroom, in the workplace, in government, in "entertainment," in the media, etc., even in "the church" negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., that which is "negative" in order (as in "new" world order) to negate the guilty conscience (that the father's/Father's authority engenders) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates (called "the negation of negation"), so they can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity, i.e., be "positive" with everyone's affirmation (approval and participation).

Not until the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will is negated in "the people's" thoughts and actions can "the people" (and therefore the socialist or despot) do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating without having a guilty conscience. With "the peoples" "support," i.e., their affirmation—'justifying' his (and their) doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating—the socialist and despot is able to establish his carnal nature, i.e., his "self," i.e., his "self interest," i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., over and therefore against doing the Father's will (that engenders a guilty conscience in him for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulates). By negating the "negative," i.e., the preaching, teaching, and discussing of the Word of God (to be accepted as is, by faith), i.e., negating the father's/Father's authority system in the public arena the socialist and the despot can be "positive," i.e., can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., can do abominable things without having a guilty conscience—with "the peoples" affirmation.

The preaching of commands and rules to be accepted as given and obeyed, the teaching of facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and the discussing of any questions those under authority might have regarding the established commands, rules, facts, and truth being preached and taught, at the one in authority's discretion (providing he deems it necessary, has time, those under authority are able to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking his authority, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system) engenders a guilty conscience in the individual and "the people" for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulation, getting in the way of the socialist and the despot who want to rule over the individual and "the people," doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating without having a guilty conscience, using the individual and "the people" as "human resource" for his own carnal pleasure and gain (in the name of "the people"), casting them aside, as a child does a toy, when they no longer serve his 'purpose,' i.e., give him pleasure or get in his way.

The pathway to "Utopia," i.e., to "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, 1) without having a guilty conscience and 2) with "the peoples" affirmation is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way. The socialist and the despot can not rule when "the people" have a guilty conscience that the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. Where are the earthly fathers in the home and the Heavenly Father in "the church" today? The father/Father is no longer honored, listened to (his/His word accepted as is, by faith), and obeyed. This is why socialism and despotism, i.e., doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates now prevails over the thoughts and actions of "the people," i.e., why "the people"—affirming ("justifying") their "self," i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—no longer have a guilty conscience for removing (negating) those who get in their way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous (those who are "negative," i.e., who preach, teach, and attempt to discuss the truth with the individual, "the people," and the leader, i.e., with those who are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, that they might develop a guilty conscience, repent, and do the Father's will instead). Under a Constitutional Republic, limited, "Bill of Rights" form of government the fathers' of the home take the place of the King, with the "representative" being their children, sent to the local, state, and national stores to buy their goods, according to their desires, i.e., their standards, i.e., their principles, i.e., their established commands, rules, facts, and truth. If the children spend the father's money on their "self," satisfying their own "self interests," i.e., their own carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, along with their friends, they are no longer sent to the store. In this way, preaching, teaching, and discussing the truth in the public arena engenders a guilty conscience in the children, i.e., in the representatives when they do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., when they "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, preventing socialism and despotism from taking over "the people." It is the guilty conscience—that the father's/Father's authority engenders—that the socialist and despot CAN NOT allow to develop in "the people" if they are to rule over "the people," doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, with "the people's" affirmation (praises).

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"[W]e recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." (Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1: Cognitive Domain) All "educators" are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Blooms' Taxonomies" in the classroom, incorporating through dialogue "the deviant student's" ideology into the classroom curriculum, in the name of "tolerance." If you tolerate wrong, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, wrong becomes right, i.e., the "norm," making right, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will wrong. Karl Marx, advocating this way of thinking, wrote: "In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy [dialogue], nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." (Karl Marx) Benjamin Bloom simply paraphrased Marx's ideology for your child's consumption (affirmation) in the "group grade" classroom.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"Spoiler Alert": there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue ("What is missing in dialogue"). In dialogue there is only the child's carnal desires ("lusts," i.e., "self interests") of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the situation and/or person is (or persons are) creating. This is why today all counselors, i.e., "educators," i.e., "leaders" go to dialogue, i.e., to the child's (your, the other person's, "the peoples," and their) "feelings" of the 'moment' instead of preaching, teaching, and discussing the truth as is—which would initiate and sustain the father's/Father's authority system and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—so the counselor, i.e., the "educator," i.e., the "leader" can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" without having a guilty conscience, with the counselee's, i.e., the student's, i.e., "the people's" affirmation. If you joined them in dialogue, instead of preaching, teaching, and attempting to discuss the truth with them, you just affirmed ('justified') their (and your) "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, establishing "human nature," i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., "self," i.e., "self interest" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority—doing your will, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth. While dad is or was not perfect, he may be or may have been a tyrant—using the office God gave him, as a child, for his own carnal "lusts," i.e., "self interests" of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—the office itself is perfect, having been given to him by God in which to serve Him, i.e., in which to preach, teach, and discuss His will to the children, creating a guilty conscience in them when they do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., when they, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, do wrong, disobey, sin, that they might repent and do right and not wrong according to His established commands, rules, facts, and truth. In dialoguing with his "self" and with his children, i.e., 'justifying' his and their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, the father's/Father's authority system, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline one's "self" in order (as in "old' world order) to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the Father's will is negated. There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue. There is only the child's carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating.

Kurt Lewin best explained the source of the guilty conscience and how to negate it, i.e., how to negate both the source and the guilty conscience at the same time.

"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)

"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves: the superego 'unites in itself the influences of the present and of the past [the "superego" identifies with the child's carnal nature, i.e., his or her "feelings," i.e., his or her love of ("lust" for) pleasure and hate of restraint—experienced in the past as well as being experienced in the present].'" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)

In other words it is the father's/Father's authority (Hebrews 12:5-11), i.e., the preaching, teaching, and discussing of the Word of God as is (not men's opinion of it) in the public arena that engenders the guilty conscience (Romans 7:14-25), i.e., that engenders "the negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child," when we do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., when we "lust," i.e., when we "covet" the thing of the world. "What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet." Romans 7:7 It is in our "lusting," i.e., our "coveting," i.e., our "self interest" that the seducer, deceiver, and manipulator is able to gain control over us to turn us into to "human resource" in order to use us for his own carnal pleasures and gain. "And through covetousness [your "self interests"] shall they with feigned words ["plastic words," Gr., i.e., doublespeak, i.e., saying one thing while meaning another, i.e., giving you what you want to hear in order to gain their trust thereby being able to move you down their pathway] make merchandise of you [turn you into "human resource" to be used for their own pleasure and gain—turning the children against their parent's authority, the citizens, including the "church," against Godly restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority so they can be bought and sold in the market place of man's carnal desires]." 2 Peter 2:3

"Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50

"For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." Romans 5:19

"Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" 2 Corinthians 10:5

"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God; not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians. 2:8, 9

"For we walk by faith [doing the Father's will], not by sight [doing our will]:" II Corinthians 5:7

The gospel message is all about the Father, i.e., the Son of God, Jesus Christ humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the Father's will which engenders a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" (which He never had since He never sinned, i.e., disobeyed the Father, 'redeeming' us, covering our sins, i.e., our disobedience, by His obedience to the Father, even in obedience to the Father dying on the cross as a propitiation for our sins, thereby, i.e., by faith in Him, His righteousness, i.e., His obedience in all things commanded by the Father is imputed to us, i.e., our unrighteousness, i.e., our sins, i.e., our disobedience, being cover by His righteousness, i.e., His holiness, i.e., His obedience to the Father, make us pure in the Father's eyes, who, in raising Jesus Christ from the grave 'reconciles' us to Himself), demanding we do the same, i.e., humbly, deny, die to, control, disciple our "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the Father's will, which engenders a guilty conscience in us for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," that we might repent and do the Father's will instead.

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21

Socialists and despots have a problem, i.e., those who are doing the father's/Father's will, having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting." The only way the socialist or despot can initiate and sustain his power (his control over "the people")—so he can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—other than by using outright force, sustaining the father's/Father's authority system, is to have "the people," doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, support him, accept him as their "savior," saving them from the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, by 'justifying' their doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., 'justify' their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. This requires the negation of the father's/Father's authority aka the "bourgeoisie" or middle-class that (naturally) engenders a guilty conscience in "the people" for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. In other words to do that which is natural, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, you must negate that which is natural, i.e., the father/Father's authority that naturally engenders a guilty conscience in the individual, "the people," and the leader for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates. This is the difference between the soul, that which is eternal and the flesh, that which is temporal.

"Prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)

The soul "KNOWS" by being told, indicative of the father's/Father's authority—preaching, teaching, discussing established commands, rules, facts, and truth in order to do or be right and not wrong The flesh "knows" by "sense experience," indicative of the child's carnal nature—dialogue., i.e., "the empty space," which is "readily adaptable to 'change.'" This is why "adults" today, acting and thinking like children, demanding what they want, when they want it, i.e., "Now!" can not hear and receive the truth, refusing to be (incapable of being) told—"Make me 'feel' good, i.e., like God (only God is good) and I will listen to you." "Hurt my 'feelings,' i.e., tell me I am a sinner, i.e., not God and I will not (can not) hear a word you say." In dialogue you are "God," in your case determining right from wrong according to your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating. In a discussion you are not, in that case KNOWING right from wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., according to what you have been told and KNOW is right.

A "more powerful enemy, the bourgeoisie [the middle class-traditional family with its "top-down" "right-wrong," "above-below," "Because I said so," "It is written" father's/Father's authority system ruling over the children, correlated to the boss ruling over the workers, the King ruling over "the people," i.e., the proletariat], whose resistance … and whose power lies ... in the force of habit, in the strength of small-scale production [private property and private business subject to the father's private convictions (belief)]." "Unfortunately, small-scale production [entrepreneurship] is still widespread in the world, and small-scale production engenders capitalism and the bourgeoisie continuously, daily, hourly, spontaneously, and on a mass scale." "... the peasantry constantly [naturally] regenerates the bourgeoisie—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "... gigantic problems of re-educating ..." "... eradicating their bourgeois habits and traditions...." "... until small-scale economy and small commodity production have entirely disappeared, the bourgeois atmosphere, proprietary habits and petty-bourgeois traditions will hamper proletarian work both outside and within the working-class movement, …" "... in every field of social activity, in all cultural and political spheres without exception." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs and traditions everywhere." "... capitalism ['capitulating' to the father's/Father's, i.e., the bosses, i.e., the King's authority, doing the father's/Father's, i.e., the bosses, i.e., the King's will] and the bourgeois [traditional family] environment … disappears very slowly even after the overthrow of the bourgeoisie, since the peasantry constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie give rise to what is essentially the same bourgeois careerism, national chauvinism, petty-bourgeois vulgarity, etc. —merely varying insignificantly in form—in positively every sphere of activity and life." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success)

"The family is one of these social forms which ... cannot be changed without change in the total social framework." (Max Horkheimer, Kritische Theori) By "focusing upon the family," i.e., upon human relationship the father's/Father's authority is negated. Sounding more like Karl Marx than Karl Marx himself (who was not yet born) Georg Hegel wrote: "On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child, where there is no antithesis of person to person or of subject to object [no "top-down" order], the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one." (George Hegel, System of Ethical Life) In other words, if we "focus on the family," making "relationship" the focus instead of doing the father's/Father's will, private property and private business, which is subject to the father's private convictions is negated, making everyone and everything subject to the collective whole.

"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)

"We are proud that in his conduct of life man has become free from external authorities, which tell him what to do and what not to do." "All that matters is that the opportunity for genuine activity be restored to the individual; that the purposes of society and of his own become identical." (Erick Fromm, Escape from Freedom)

The problem for all socialists (Fascists included) and despots is the father's/Father's authority that engenders a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," i.e., for doing the socialist's and despot's will. When private, i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" is separated from the public, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which all men have in common, the father's/Father's authority rules. When private, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will goes into partnership with the public, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," private, i.e., the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders is negated, i.e., "Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee" is negated. (Psalms 119:11)

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

You can not see your hate of restraint as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., "lust," i.e., "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—making you not just wicked but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain it, keep it, or get it back. All man can do is 'justify' his "self" when he 'creates' a "healthy environment" in order to 'create' a "healthy person." No environment he 'creates' can resolve the human heart, i.e., his love of pleasure, i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal things of the world (including the affirmation, i.e., the praises of men) and his hate of restraint, i.e., his hate of the father's/Fathers' authority that gets in the way.

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual [i.e., Lust reconciles us to the world.]." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

Socialism is based upon what all men, women, and children have in common, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which "is of the world" only. Karl Marx simply renamed "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which "is of the world," "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience," i.e., that which is "only of Nature" in order to make man's (his) carnal nature sound academic—when you make "human nature" a "science" and apply it, all you can end up with is "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which "is of the world" only, i.e., "lawfulness without law," i.e., man's carnal nature, i.e., the "flesh" ruling without Godly restraint getting in the way, with socialists and despots ruling the world, oppressing "the people." Socialists and despots must therefore negate the father's/Father's authority in order to do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" without having a guilty conscience. This is accomplished when everyone, dialoguing their opinions to a consensus (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process—there is only the person's "self interest," i.e., carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or person is stimulating, i.e., "lust"), affirm each others carnal nature, i.e., "self interest," i.e., "lusts," i.e., "human nature," i.e., natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—in order (as in "new" world order) for the leader(s) to do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity, i.e., with everyone's, i.e., "the group's," i.e., "the people's" approval. The only obstacle (barrier) standing in the socialist's and despot's way is the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting." Until they negate the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience it engenders in the thoughts and actions of the children/"the people," they can not initiate and sustain control over the children/"the people."

"Once the earthly family is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family, the former must then itself be destroyed in theory and in practice." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

In other words: "Once the earthly family," with children having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth "is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family," with the Son humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do the Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, "the former," i.e., the earthly father's authority, i.e., the system itself with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father (their parents), their teacher, the laws of the land, etc., "must then itself be destroyed," i.e., vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated "in theory and in practice," i.e., in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions—resulting in children no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon the father's/Father's (their parents/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their carnal nature, i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' which the world is stimulating, in order (as in "new" world order) to 'create a "new" world order of "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lawlessness" where the child's carnal nature rules without parental restraint."

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence ["the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., that which "is of the world" only]." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

Discussion is indicative of the father's/Father's authority where the child/man must suspend, as upon a cross his carnal desires, i.e., his "self interests," i.e., his "lust" of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating in order to hear and receive the truth—inhibiting or blocking 'change.' Conversely, in dialogue the child must suspend, as upon a cross any established command, rule, fact, or truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority in order to hear and identify with the other person's carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lust" of the moment that the world (the situation) is stimulating, "building relationship" with them based upon the carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lust" they have in common—initiating and sustaining 'change.'

"It is not individualism [the child/man obeying the father/Father, doing the father's/Father's will, having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting"] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society [the "building relationships upon self interest"] is the necessary framework through which freedom [to "lust"] and individuality [without having a guilty conscience] are made realities." (Karl Marx) "Only within a social context individual man is able to realize his own potential as a rational being." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right)

"Freud commented that only through the solidarity of all the participants could the sense of guilt be assuaged." "According to Freud, the ultimate essence of our being is erotic, and demands activity according to the pleasure-principle." "Eros is the foundation of morality." (Brown)

"'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same." "... the hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother—[which] culminates in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud)

"If the guilt accumulated in the civilized domination of man by man can ever be redeemed by freedom, then the 'original sin' must be committed again: 'We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence." (Marcuse)

"To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit" (Brown)

The first and master facilitator of 'change,' 'changed' the world by bringing dialogue into a garden called Eden (Genesis 3:1-6), 'liberating' two "children" from the Father's authority though dialogue, resulting in them, not admitting they were wrong and repenting, but as 'liberal's' throwing someone else "under the bus" (Adam blaming the woman, as well as God for creating her, the woman blaming the Serpent) when they got caught, doing so without having a guilty conscience.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12